Message from discussion
'Ethical' SEO?
Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!prodigy.com!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr17.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!e625307f!not-for-mail
From: from_...@nomail.com (C.W.)
Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
Subject: Re: 'Ethical' SEO?
Message-ID: <418a7c10.76258710@news.prodigy.net>
References: <cmdsa2$s2e$1@sparta.btinternet.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 46
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.239.216.229
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr17.news.prodigy.com 1099595772 ST000 4.239.216.229 (Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:16:12 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:16:12 EST
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
X-UserInfo1: [[OUS\KEGJW[SRP[KBCDN_HAQB^H@IPDLXUNNHPIMASJETAANVW[AKWZE\]^XQWIGNE_[EBL@^_\^JOCQ^RSNVLGTFTKHTXHHP[NB\_C@\SD@EP_[KCXX__AGDDEKGFNB\ZOKLRNCY_CGG[RHT_UN@C_BSY\G__IJIX_PLSA[CCFAULEY\FL\VLGANTQQ]FN
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:16:12 GMT
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:27:27 +0000 (UTC), <spam...@postmaster.co.uk>
wrote:
[snip]
>
>They quote Google in their booklet, while talking about ethics of your SEO
>agency saying alarm bells should ring if... "Your SEO provider puts links
>into their other clients on doorway pages."
>
>BMM put links into themselves on every page they build. On their smaller
>pages, this is a visible "Search Engine Optimisation by Big Mouth Media"
>tag, with a clickable link. They also list themselves, with a URL in the
>pages META DATA. This is free advertising for bigmouth, and greatly improves
>their ranking for "Search Engine Optimisation" it appears to do nothing for
>the client at all.
[snip]
>This appears to operate in direct contradiction to Google's guidelines
>(regarding building pages for search engines rather than users). Their
>linking back to themselves from client sites, and this inter-site linking
>also appears to be in direct contradiction with Google's guidelines.
Not commentiing about the inter-linking within the company's own site
... but ...
I don't see how a link to a company, doing the SEO, in the footer of
every page of the site is any different from a site design firm that
also puts a links back to their own site in the footer of a client's
site.
In terms of the Google guidelines, in regards to the links you pointed
out being on client's sites, I think Google were more so referring to
"doorway pages" that were created simply for sharing links to boost
the backlinks thoughts. More blatent than one backlink shared in a
footer [An example of what I mean would be the doorway pages like the
ones Traffic Power created for their clients] ... and some people
theorize footer links are not heavily weighted compared to links
appearing in the main body of content.
In terms of the clients "not knowing" - you have admitted to not
knowing if this particular SEO firm's clients know [and/or agreed]
about the META tag or not. So hard call on claiming that was being
doing unethically or not.
Carol
|
