Of course in retrospect it forms an interesting historical snapshot.
Emotions were running very high, at a fever pitch at that moment - it was
not the normal practice of watchmakers to scratch more than their names and
the date of service. Still, I see it as unprofessional, then and now. It
bothers me when I see for example sports columnists in the newspaper make
snide remarks about the President that have nothing to do with their job
(they did this more with Bush - Obama is (for now) their hero).
"SWG" <swisswatch
...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1c1badce-f16c-428a-90c0-be0f5e337131@j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 30, 7:08 pm, "Jack Denver" <nunuv
...@netscape.net> wrote:
> I dunno but I'd be pissed if my watchmaker wrote all over the dial side of
> my watch like that.
I imagine that the contents of the message would be of essence.
It did not impair the good working of the watch though and gave the
newspaper a good story. Imagine that in year 2159 a similar story
could be written about yours' ? What a nice topics for alt.horology!