Message from discussion
Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:52:51 -0500
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:00:59 -0700
From: Rich <some...@someplace.not>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: uk.politics.environment,sci.environment,alt.global-warming
Subject: Re: Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict
global warming theory
References: <41e9fec6-9149-4b92-83ee-3e3f2f92d8b5@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <dd02a966-2fe0-4a70-87bb-37f66bc5e0a2@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <a06b607d-a8b6-4c59-9fa4-7aa0210be12a@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <5687d71a-357e-487d-9bfc-3e7f1629d482@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <5687d71a-357e-487d-9bfc-3e7f1629d482@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <E4idnUyNKoVucT3VnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@comcast.com>
Lines: 16
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.202.211.187
X-Trace: sv3-s2LeIYFcdSShp6XbrQ0TLzghoyd8jHKREH7rkxAkNLCSmykVdl2+er+LednzyWfT4QaNAXqyB5cc4vf!csdKMBKIpb7xXkdDS1lCfdWW2c6WzoWSxr1RX4bKfJKwSVBSJrG3oOSl4Gc5gbzA9DTD4denmd2U!tbiE7r19+i4K5fzLzJutzwaJAUXCt/0=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: d...@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
nada wrote:
> The bottom line is do we want to continue experimenting on the planet
> by pumping as much CO2 as we can into the atmosphere?
No, the bottom line is are you willing to starve, and let your
family starve *today* because the "mitigation strategies" basically
pull the rug out from under your economy and food chain.
Why needs AGW, the mitigation strategies are a clear and present
danger today.
Cheers,
Rich
> David
|
