|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: uk.politics.environment, sci.environment, alt.global-warming
From: Rich <some...@someplace.not>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:00:59 -0700
Local: Tues 12 Aug 2008 03:00
Subject: Re: Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
nada wrote: No, the bottom line is are you willing to starve, and let your > The bottom line is do we want to continue experimenting on the planet > by pumping as much CO2 as we can into the atmosphere? family starve *today* because the "mitigation strategies" basically pull the rug out from under your economy and food chain. Why needs AGW, the mitigation strategies are a clear and present Cheers, Rich > David
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||