Message from discussion Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory

Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:54:38 -0500
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:02:47 -0700
From: Rich <some...@someplace.not>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: uk.politics.environment,sci.environment,alt.global-warming
Subject: Re: Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict 
 global warming theory
References: <41e9fec6-9149-4b92-83ee-3e3f2f92d8b5@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> 	<dd02a966-2fe0-4a70-87bb-37f66bc5e0a2@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com> 	<_cadnSFawoMF0z3VnZ2dnUVZ_sHinZ2d@comcast.com> <fa6ee197-0545-4461-9dbd-c9c3c5342e68@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <fa6ee197-0545-4461-9dbd-c9c3c5342e68@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <E4idnU-NKoXCcD3VnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@comcast.com>
Lines: 41
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.202.211.187
X-Trace: sv3-q33yxBaswnXdoTQIBxPVT0tUJrxk83uxCl20O+EcevX9TvOkf6lfVxmcbTsmTxzUHQhpLIEtJxj5IBB!bXx5dICbJqJdjymYMua4KqLU9TYb76lRRwFHv/vbpbBeJRazRa6PrnmeNt1jzw4oUy+UVp7PR9Pr!PWhxLn7gPJ40b6cDXd2kfS4IQ6QYvgs=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: d...@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39

Lloyd wrote:
> On Aug 11, 10:45 am, Rich <some...@someplace.not> wrote:
>> Fran wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Here's somerthing pertinent for you in which a discussion on aerosols
>>> takes place
>>> http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/11/4/14560/6189
>> Aren't they the ones demanding Nuremberg-sytle trials for dem 'ebil
>> deniers? You'd probably support that Fran.
>>
>>> You might also want to look atwww.realclimate.orgor look at the work
>>> of Joseph Romm
>> And realclimate is the very definition of a vested interest.
>>
>> Got any unbiased sources?
> 
> Just National Academy of Sciences, Royal Society, American Geophysical
> Union, American Physics Society, NASA, NOAA, EPA...

Are they unbiased? Or do they simply echo biased sources?

If you claim that they have no vested interest in AGW, feel
free to show it.

> And we know you don't have any unbiased sources.

You believe lots of things Lloyd. But I don't need sources
to ask you the basis for your beliefs. You are the source.

Cheers,

Rich

>> Cheers,
>>
>> Rich
>>
>>> Fran
>