Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory - alt.global-warming

Message from discussion Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Fran <Fran.B...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.socialism.trotsky,uk.politics.environment,alt.global-warming,talk.politics.mideast
Subject: Re: Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict 
	global warming theory
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <9c368aed-0dc9-4a26-8bdf-6b911ff74e2e@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
References: <41e9fec6-9149-4b92-83ee-3e3f2f92d8b5@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> 
	<dd02a966-2fe0-4a70-87bb-37f66bc5e0a2@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com> 
	<6onv94de6pb25igmvq0rache595smppmrq@4ax.com> <jP7ok.2841$in.2463@read1.cgocable.net> 
	<73ab50bc-0173-4f02-885a-593bfb0ee076@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> 
	<961f73a3-dfc1-4bab-84f0-a3035c7fdab6@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> 
	<dGzok.8860$rD2.7932@bignews4.bellsouth.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.49.9.74
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1218661814 24016 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2008 21:10:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:10:14 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=210.49.9.74; 
	posting-account=LNl2nQoAAADrE2ege-lZHJagqFiDklsV
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 
	2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

On Aug 13, 9:36=A0pm, Poetic Justice <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-
Dog.com> wrote:
> Fran wrote:
> > On Aug 13, 5:06 am, Steve Wallis
> > <revolutionarysocialistst...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> Note: Google Groups now says that it does not support sending messages
> >> to sci.environment, despite the fact that I sent my previous messages
> >> to it; hence I am only posting this message to the other four groups.
>
> >> On 11 Aug, 15:20, "V for Vendicar"
>
> > Of course, the GPC [global polluters cartel] spruikers have blown a
> > proposal for research by a handful of scientists into a world wide
> > scientific consensus. They simply have no regard for honesty.
>
> > Fran
>
> You could insert AGWers(for GPC) to correct the paragraph.

But that would be incorrect, because the IPCC, unlike a cuple of press
articles, does represent the consensus of opinion on fruitful inquiry
and policy.

Fran