|
|
alt.global-warming |
On Aug 11, 10:02 pm, Rich <some...@someplace.not> wrote: > >> [...] > >>> Here's somerthing pertinent for you in which a discussion on aerosols > >>> You might also want to look atwww.realclimate.orgorlook at the work > >> Got any unbiased sources? > > Just National Academy of Sciences, Royal Society, American Geophysical > Are they unbiased? Or do they simply echo biased sources? > > And we know you don't have any unbiased sources. > You believe lots of things Lloyd. But I don't need sources > Cheers, > Rich > >> Cheers, > >> Rich > >>> Fran
> Lloyd wrote: Oh give us a break. Either you're a 10-year old or you're a kook.
> > On Aug 11, 10:45 am, Rich <some...@someplace.not> wrote:
> >> Fran wrote:
> >>> takes place
> >>>http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/11/4/14560/6189
> >> Aren't they the ones demanding Nuremberg-sytle trials for dem 'ebil
> >> deniers? You'd probably support that Fran.
> >>> of Joseph Romm
> >> And realclimate is the very definition of a vested interest.
> > Union, American Physics Society, NASA, NOAA, EPA...
> If you claim that they have no vested interest in AGW, feel If you have half a brain, feel free to show it.
> free to show it.
> to ask you the basis for your beliefs. You are the source.