Message from discussion
Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: nada <dwalters...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: uk.politics.environment,alt.global-warming,talk.politics.mideast
Subject: Re: Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict
global warming theory
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <e95ba665-e736-4254-a6d9-076bd9539fcd@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: <41e9fec6-9149-4b92-83ee-3e3f2f92d8b5@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
<dd02a966-2fe0-4a70-87bb-37f66bc5e0a2@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
<6onv94de6pb25igmvq0rache595smppmrq@4ax.com> <jP7ok.2841$in.2463@read1.cgocable.net>
<73ab50bc-0173-4f02-885a-593bfb0ee076@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
<961f73a3-dfc1-4bab-84f0-a3035c7fdab6@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
<dGzok.8860$rD2.7932@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <9c368aed-0dc9-4a26-8bdf-6b911ff74e2e@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.210.111.9
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1218663769 29116 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2008 21:42:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:42:49 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=98.210.111.9;
posting-account=FP7-6AoAAAD3wdsbiiZxfdr0GMAH9Rm3
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 Firefox/2.0.0.16,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
On Aug 13, 2:10 pm, Fran <Fran.B...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 13, 9:36 pm, Poetic Justice <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-
>
>
>
> Dog.com> wrote:
> > Fran wrote:
> > > On Aug 13, 5:06 am, Steve Wallis
> > > <revolutionarysocialistst...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > >> Note: Google Groups now says that it does not support sending messages
> > >> to sci.environment, despite the fact that I sent my previous messages
> > >> to it; hence I am only posting this message to the other four groups.
>
> > >> On 11 Aug, 15:20, "V for Vendicar"
>
> > > Of course, the GPC [global polluters cartel] spruikers have blown a
> > > proposal for research by a handful of scientists into a world wide
> > > scientific consensus. They simply have no regard for honesty.
>
> > > Fran
>
> > You could insert AGWers(for GPC) to correct the paragraph.
>
> But that would be incorrect, because the IPCC, unlike a cuple of press
> articles, does represent the consensus of opinion on fruitful inquiry
> and policy.
>
> Fran
Well it's a "concensus", but you have to look who is on the IPCC to
get better picture.
D.
|
