|
|
alt.global-warming |
On Aug 13, 2:10 pm, Fran <Fran.B...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dog.com> wrote: > > >> On 11 Aug, 15:20, "V for Vendicar" > > > Of course, the GPC [global polluters cartel] spruikers have blown a > > > Fran > > You could insert AGWers(for GPC) to correct the paragraph. > But that would be incorrect, because the IPCC, unlike a cuple of press > Fran D.
> On Aug 13, 9:36 pm, Poetic Justice <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n- Well it's a "concensus", but you have to look who is on the IPCC to
> > Fran wrote:
> > > On Aug 13, 5:06 am, Steve Wallis
> > > <revolutionarysocialistst...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > >> Note: Google Groups now says that it does not support sending messages
> > >> to sci.environment, despite the fact that I sent my previous messages
> > >> to it; hence I am only posting this message to the other four groups.
> > > proposal for research by a handful of scientists into a world wide
> > > scientific consensus. They simply have no regard for honesty.
> articles, does represent the consensus of opinion on fruitful inquiry
> and policy.
get better picture.