Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
alt.global-warming
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
nada  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 13 Aug 2008, 22:42
Newsgroups: uk.politics.environment, alt.global-warming, talk.politics.mideast
From: nada <dwalters...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed 13 Aug 2008 22:42
Subject: Re: Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Aug 13, 2:10 pm, Fran <Fran.B...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 13, 9:36 pm, Poetic Justice <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-

> Dog.com> wrote:
> > Fran wrote:
> > > On Aug 13, 5:06 am, Steve Wallis
> > > <revolutionarysocialistst...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > >> Note: Google Groups now says that it does not support sending messages
> > >> to sci.environment, despite the fact that I sent my previous messages
> > >> to it; hence I am only posting this message to the other four groups.

> > >> On 11 Aug, 15:20, "V for Vendicar"

> > > Of course, the GPC [global polluters cartel] spruikers have blown a
> > > proposal for research by a handful of scientists into a world wide
> > > scientific consensus. They simply have no regard for honesty.

> > > Fran

> > You could insert AGWers(for GPC) to correct the paragraph.

> But that would be incorrect, because the IPCC, unlike a cuple of press
> articles, does represent the consensus of opinion on fruitful inquiry
> and policy.

> Fran

Well it's a "concensus", but you have to look who is on the IPCC to
get better picture.

D.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google