Message from discussion
Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:04:32 -0500
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:12:40 -0700
From: Rich <some...@someplace.not>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: uk.politics.environment,sci.environment,alt.global-warming,talk.politics.mideast
Subject: Re: Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict
global warming theory
References: <41e9fec6-9149-4b92-83ee-3e3f2f92d8b5@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <dd02a966-2fe0-4a70-87bb-37f66bc5e0a2@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <a06b607d-a8b6-4c59-9fa4-7aa0210be12a@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <a06b607d-a8b6-4c59-9fa4-7aa0210be12a@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <NZudnbdIPvWN_j3VnZ2dnUVZ_rbinZ2d@comcast.com>
Lines: 22
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.202.211.187
X-Trace: sv3-e2DyAD3cf6iNRgguZdxdtl3AOjneDTPKOvqtDQ6znUVjF5paFfBVM+exjnRHbSFhN6Uy7wYh8BYL0Rg!TZeIJTpZNTCgbm4ejwmQmogGxJcV3lFDOw1EHsXeI/VBaQgzZutY5GrI8WRk92MsSUcgZsvNXg+d!7RHXpzJaj1/x2HfpWef2jZ63Q3UZyGk=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: d...@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Steve Wallis wrote:
> On 11 Aug, 01:32, Fran <Fran.B...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>> <sigh> regional weather is not climate. Climate is, by definition, a
>> sustained and predictable patern of weather over a period long enough
>> to reduce to noise regional weather anomalies.
>
> Yes, I know, but it makes an already rather scpetical public even more
> sceptical about global warming theory. Perhaps the Chinese regime is
> currently playing lip-service to global warming theory but I wouldn't
> imagine the general public in China is very convinced of it!
Fran is 100% convinced, she thinks China is a shining example which
America should try to emulate (and presumably everyone else). She
also says that they have the lowest pollution.
Cheers,
Rich