|
|
alt.global-warming |
On Aug 11, 9:12 am, Rich <some...@someplace.not> wrote: > [...] > >> <sigh> regional weather is not climate. Climate is, by definition, a > > Yes, I know, but it makes an already rather scpetical public even more > Fran is 100% convinced, she thinks China is a shining example which > Cheers, > Rich China IS a shingin example because they are taking energy seriously. David
> Steve Wallis wrote: First, Steve misunderstood me...we should keep this discussion limited
> > On 11 Aug, 01:32, Fran <Fran.B...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> sustained and predictable patern of weather over a period long enough
> >> to reduce to noise regional weather anomalies.
> > sceptical about global warming theory. Perhaps the Chinese regime is
> > currently playing lip-service to global warming theory but I wouldn't
> > imagine the general public in China is very convinced of it!
> America should try to emulate (and presumably everyone else). She
> also says that they have the lowest pollution.
to environmental and energy NGs, not political ones. So it's staying
on the above 4 NGs.
They are, simply put, exploring *every* option bar none. From wind, to
tidal, to all forms of solar, to nuclear (160 GWs being planned), to
clean coal, to dirty coal, to bio diesel. You name it, they are
exploring it, and backing it up to the tune of billions of USD worth
of R&D.