Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
alt.global-warming
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
nada  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 11 Aug 2008, 18:14
Newsgroups: uk.politics.environment, sci.environment, alt.global-warming, talk.politics.mideast
From: nada <dwalters...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon 11 Aug 2008 18:14
Subject: Re: Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Aug 11, 9:12 am, Rich <some...@someplace.not> wrote:

> Steve Wallis wrote:
> > On 11 Aug, 01:32, Fran <Fran.B...@gmail.com> wrote:

> [...]

> >> <sigh> regional weather is not climate. Climate is, by definition, a
> >> sustained and predictable patern of weather over a period long enough
> >> to reduce to noise regional weather anomalies.

> > Yes, I know, but it makes an already rather scpetical public even more
> > sceptical about global warming theory. Perhaps the Chinese regime is
> > currently playing lip-service to global warming theory but I wouldn't
> > imagine the general public in China is very convinced of it!

> Fran is 100% convinced, she thinks China is a shining example which
> America should try to emulate (and presumably everyone else). She
> also says that they have the lowest pollution.

> Cheers,

> Rich

First, Steve misunderstood me...we should keep this discussion limited
to environmental and energy NGs, not political ones. So it's staying
on the above 4 NGs.

China IS a shingin example because they are taking energy seriously.
They are, simply put, exploring *every* option bar none. From wind, to
tidal, to all forms of solar, to nuclear (160 GWs being planned), to
clean coal, to dirty coal, to bio diesel. You name it, they are
exploring it, and backing it up to the tune of billions of USD worth
of R&D.

David


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google