Message from discussion
Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Lloyd <lpar...@emory.edu>
Newsgroups: uk.politics.environment,sci.environment,alt.global-warming
Subject: Re: Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict
global warming theory
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <fa6ee197-0545-4461-9dbd-c9c3c5342e68@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References: <41e9fec6-9149-4b92-83ee-3e3f2f92d8b5@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
<dd02a966-2fe0-4a70-87bb-37f66bc5e0a2@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
<_cadnSFawoMF0z3VnZ2dnUVZ_sHinZ2d@comcast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 170.140.55.46
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1218477645 20525 127.0.0.1 (11 Aug 2008 18:00:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:00:45 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=170.140.55.46;
posting-account=EDxswQkAAAAMtpGIdULRoliPhqEA85o4
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16)
Gecko/20080702 Firefox/2.0.0.16,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
On Aug 11, 10:45 am, Rich <some...@someplace.not> wrote:
> Fran wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Here's somerthing pertinent for you in which a discussion on aerosols
> > takes place
>
> >http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/11/4/14560/6189
>
> Aren't they the ones demanding Nuremberg-sytle trials for dem 'ebil
> deniers? You'd probably support that Fran.
>
> > You might also want to look atwww.realclimate.orgor look at the work
> > of Joseph Romm
>
> And realclimate is the very definition of a vested interest.
>
> Got any unbiased sources?
Just National Academy of Sciences, Royal Society, American Geophysical
Union, American Physics Society, NASA, NOAA, EPA...
And we know you don't have any unbiased sources.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rich
>
> > Fran
|
