|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: uk.politics.environment, sci.environment, alt.global-warming
From: Lloyd <lpar...@emory.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon 11 Aug 2008 19:00
Subject: Re: Global dimming and ice age predictions after WW2 contradict global warming theory
On Aug 11, 10:45 am, Rich <some...@someplace.not> wrote:
> Fran wrote: Just National Academy of Sciences, Royal Society, American Geophysical > [...] > > Here's somerthing pertinent for you in which a discussion on aerosols > >http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/11/4/14560/6189 > Aren't they the ones demanding Nuremberg-sytle trials for dem 'ebil > > You might also want to look atwww.realclimate.orgor look at the work > And realclimate is the very definition of a vested interest. > Got any unbiased sources? Union, American Physics Society, NASA, NOAA, EPA... And we know you don't have any unbiased sources. > Cheers, > Rich > > Fran You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||