Climate change looks like being the greatest hoax of the 21st century!
November 4 2009
The cult back then comprised computer experts.
They predicted disaster.
Planes would fall from the skies.
People would be caught in halting elevators.
Chaos would descend on anything that relied on a computer, from financial markets to utilities. Governments duly prepared for disaster with the BBC reporting that global preparations for the millennium bug were estimated to have cost more than $US300 billion.
All for nought.
Nothing happened.
It was, as James Taranto wrote in The Wall Street Journal, the hoax of the century.
Maurice Newman, who was chairman of the federal government's Y2K committee told The Australian last week that "in pressing the urgency for compliance, the committee members relied heavily on confirmatory bias. Most of this came from so-called experts who had much to gain from creating a sense of alarm. The consequence of widespread inaction was claimed to result in chaos and systemic failure. As there was no alternative authoritative voice, this became perceived wisdom and was certainly believed by the committee. As such the Y2K phenomenon took on a life of its own."
Deja vu?
Preparing for the deluge of rising sea levels, we were treated to footage last week from parliamentary question time starring Julia Gillard and her gumboots.
Appropriately she was followed on ABC1 by Bananas in Pyjamas.
Could man-made climate change turn out to be the greatest hoax of the present century?
Certainly, ordinary people are beginning to ask questions.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation."
Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:54:28 +1100, "bo n o" <s...@t.com> wrote:
>Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the hard work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
That the media didn't understand the situation (and you appear to have bought their hype) does not make it a hoax. Only the gullible were hoaxed.
-- Shill #2
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. Galileo Galilei
Government Shill #2 wrote: > On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:54:28 +1100, "bo n o" <s...@t.com> wrote:
>> Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been > disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the hard > work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
> That the media didn't understand the situation (and you appear to have > bought their hype) does not make it a hoax. Only the gullible were hoaxed.
Too many words, bonzo is a troll. Y2K and Climate change are unrelated.
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:08:37 +0100, BDR529 <jake.> wrote: >Government Shill #2 wrote: >> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:54:28 +1100, "bo n o" <s...@t.com> wrote:
>>> Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
>> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been >> disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the hard >> work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
>> That the media didn't understand the situation (and you appear to have >> bought their hype) does not make it a hoax. Only the gullible were hoaxed.
>Too many words, bonzo is a troll.
Oh, yeah. I am aware of that. And not a very smart one.
>Y2K and Climate change are unrelated.
Well, in as far as, if nothing was done about either then we'd all be in a bad way, they are sort of related.
Of course, Bozo doesn't know about the smart people who averted the Y2K problem and isn't smart enough to understand the climate change issue either.
-- Shill #2
A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:54:28 +1100, "bo n o" <s...@t.com> wrote:
>>Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been > disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the hard > work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
GARBAGE! This is proved by ABSOLUTELY NOTHING happening in so-called "unprepared" countries of the third world etc! All it did was enrich the IT specialists, just as greenhoax is enriching the likes of Gore, carbon traders etc.
Warmest Regards
Bon z0
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
> Government Shill #2 wrote: >> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:54:28 +1100, "bo n o" <s...@t.com> wrote:
>>> Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
>> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been >> disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the hard >> work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
>> That the media didn't understand the situation (and you appear to have >> bought their hype) does not make it a hoax. Only the gullible were >> hoaxed.
> Too many words, bonzo is a troll. Y2K and Climate change are unrelated.
Oh yes they are related ... they're both massive hoaxes.
Warmest Regards
Bon z0
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, ResearCH Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:08:37 +0100, BDR529 <jake.> wrote:
>>Government Shill #2 wrote: >>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:54:28 +1100, "bo n o" <s...@t.com> wrote:
>>>> Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
>>> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been >>> disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the >>> hard >>> work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
>>> That the media didn't understand the situation (and you appear to have >>> bought their hype) does not make it a hoax. Only the gullible were >>> hoaxed.
>>Too many words, bonzo is a troll.
> Oh, yeah. I am aware of that. And not a very smart one.
>>Y2K and Climate change are unrelated.
> Well, in as far as, if nothing was done about either then we'd all be in a > bad way,
Are you serious? So why aren't the "unprepared" countries like Russia and many third world countries "in a bad way" then?
Warmest Regards
Bon z0
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
>> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been >> disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the hard >> work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
>GARBAGE! >This is proved by ABSOLUTELY NOTHING happening in so-called "unprepared" >countries of the third world etc!
Bwahahahahahaha!
Did you understand what you just wrote? Of course not.
-- Shill #2
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round... theobviousgcashman
>>>Government Shill #2 wrote: >>>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:54:28 +1100, "bo n o" <s...@t.com> wrote:
>>>>> Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
>>>> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been >>>> disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the >>>> hard >>>> work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
>>>> That the media didn't understand the situation (and you appear to have >>>> bought their hype) does not make it a hoax. Only the gullible were >>>> hoaxed.
>>>Too many words, bonzo is a troll.
>> Oh, yeah. I am aware of that. And not a very smart one.
>>>Y2K and Climate change are unrelated.
>> Well, in as far as, if nothing was done about either then we'd all be in a >> bad way,
>Are you serious? >So why aren't the "unprepared" countries like Russia and many third world >countries "in a bad way" then?
In regards to Y2K? Unprepared?
Dud! Y2K was 10 years ago. You can't buy a 80486 PC anymore. Not even in Russia or a 3rd world country.
-- Shill #2
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round... theobviousgcashman
Hey don't knock Y2K. We made lots of money out of the scare tactics used back then. Remember the claims? Aircraft were going to fall out of the sky. Radio and TV were going to fail. All the space communication and positioning systems were going to quit. And on midnight I was on Firetalk with the fearful around the world and laughing at the claims. We got to the Millenium first. Its a dateline thing. After about 3 hours even the most ardent believer had to accept that they'd been sold a pup.
bo n o wrote: > Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
No, not at all. It was never going to be what the media beat it up to be, but it was a major problem with a lot of systems which did not use more than 2 digits to record a date. A lot of money and a lot of hard work went into sorting these systems out that were going to have issues. If this had not been done a much larger amount of money would've been lost when those systems started shooting themselves in the foot when the year clicked over.
> Climate change looks like being the greatest hoax of the 21st century!
I'd have to agree, this truly is a hoax, the evidence doesn't support it, only the paranoia does.
>>>>Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
>>> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been >>> disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the >>> hard >>> work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
>>GARBAGE! >>This is proved by ABSOLUTELY NOTHING happening in so-called "unprepared" >>countries of the third world etc!
> Bwahahahahahaha!
> Did you understand what you just wrote? Of course not.
You obviously didn't understand what I wrote, now, did you?
Warmest Regards
Bon z0
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
>>>>Government Shill #2 wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:54:28 +1100, "bo n o" <s...@t.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
>>>>> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been >>>>> disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the >>>>> hard >>>>> work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
>>>>> That the media didn't understand the situation (and you appear to have >>>>> bought their hype) does not make it a hoax. Only the gullible were >>>>> hoaxed.
>>>>Too many words, bonzo is a troll.
>>> Oh, yeah. I am aware of that. And not a very smart one.
>>>>Y2K and Climate change are unrelated.
>>> Well, in as far as, if nothing was done about either then we'd all be in >>> a >>> bad way,
>>Are you serious? >>So why aren't the "unprepared" countries like Russia and many third world >>countries "in a bad way" then?
> In regards to Y2K? Unprepared?
> Dud! Y2K was 10 years ago. You can't buy a 80486 PC anymore. Not even in > Russia or a 3rd world country.
OK, I'll rephrase ...
So why WEREN'T the "unprepared" countries like Russia and many third world countries "in a bad way" in 2000?
ANSWER: Because nothing happened ... even to non-Y2K compliant computers.
Also Do you know of even one computer crashing in 2000? I'm sure there were many which weren't Y2K compliant at the time.
Warmest Regards
Bon z0
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
> bo n o wrote: >> Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
> No, not at all. It was never going to be what the media beat it up to be, > but it was a major problem with a lot of systems which did not use more > than 2 digits to record a date. A lot of money and a lot of hard work went > into sorting these systems out that were going to have issues. If this had > not been done a much larger amount of money would've been lost when those > systems started shooting themselves in the foot when the year clicked > over.
Do you know of even one system which "shot itself in the foot "? I'm sure there were at least a few non-Y2K compliant computers at the time.
Warmest Regards
Bon z0
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
>>>>>Government Shill #2 wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:54:28 +1100, "bo n o" <s...@t.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
>>>>>> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been >>>>>> disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the >>>>>> hard >>>>>> work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
>>>>>> That the media didn't understand the situation (and you appear to have >>>>>> bought their hype) does not make it a hoax. Only the gullible were >>>>>> hoaxed.
>>>>>Too many words, bonzo is a troll.
>>>> Oh, yeah. I am aware of that. And not a very smart one.
>>>>>Y2K and Climate change are unrelated.
>>>> Well, in as far as, if nothing was done about either then we'd all be in >>>> a >>>> bad way,
>>>Are you serious? >>>So why aren't the "unprepared" countries like Russia and many third world >>>countries "in a bad way" then?
>> In regards to Y2K? Unprepared?
>> Dud! Y2K was 10 years ago. You can't buy a 80486 PC anymore. Not even in >> Russia or a 3rd world country.
>OK, I'll rephrase ...
>So why WEREN'T the "unprepared" countries like Russia and many third world >countries "in a bad way" in 2000?
Who says they were unprepared?
>ANSWER: Because nothing happened ... even to non-Y2K compliant computers.
Or... Russia and 3rd world countries didn't rely heavily on Intel based processors.
>Also >Do you know of even one computer crashing in 2000?
Even one computer crashing in 2000? I saw hundreds.
>I'm sure there were many which weren't Y2K compliant at the time.
You may be sure. You would be wrong. As I already said, vast amounts of time, effort and money were put into replacing computers that weren't Y2K compliant. That you and the media missed this does not make it a hoax. No matter how hard you close your eyes and wish for it to be.
-- Shill #2
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round... theobviousgcashman
Discussion subject changed to "THE ALLEGED SPANISH FLU OF 1918-1921 & ASIAN FLU OF 1958 PANDEMIES WERE IN FACT THE BLACK PLAGUE !" by Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
25 to 40 millions death in the world demonstrating that the Jenner / Pasteurian Criminals theories were & are complete fraud... and so the alleged preventive Vaccinations orchestrated by the WHO criminal organisation in Switzerland ...leading to immediate Guillain-Barré Syndrome in the quickest response of the organism ( an acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), an autoimmune disorder affecting the peripheral nervous system. GBS is a side- effect of influenza vaccines ) ... and in slower responses Myopathies of Duchêne, Alzheimer, Parkinson, M.Sclerosis & of course paralytic death
Of course the French & British Government did everything to hide the frauds of the most outstanding Holocaust Criminals in all History of Mankind : The Jenner / Pasteur antibiotic clueless fools , the first credited with the worse Tuberculosis Pandemy thanks to his Vaccine Turberculinis strain found in infected cow pustules pus & the other fool with the Lung Cancer & other types of cancers thanks to his abominable vaccine poisons ! Hence although millions were buried in both countries by Tumbrels fulls at night in common graves, nothing transpired except in Spain, which has not vested interest in supporting a most fraudulent science of alleged Medecine ! Of course the clueless Pollies are just doing what told to them by the greedy vaccine producing labs living out of Humanity beliefs that the causes of dizeazezz are germz, viruzez & eugenezzz ! Of course the Black Plagues of 1918 & 1958 demonstrate the fallacies of such Jenner / Pasteur theories, and this is why the real symptoms of the alleged Spanish & Asian Flu were carefully hidden. André Malraux, Minister of the French Republic died of the Black Plague indeed, a few weeks after being vaccinated with an alleged harmless Flu shot.
At the time of writing, only POLAND OF ALL NATIONS HAS THE COURAGE TO REFUSE TO BE PARTY IN THE MASSACRE OF HIS OWN POPULATION BY THE SEASONAL FLU SHOT WHICH UNKNOWN TO ALL CONTAINS THE 3 STRAINS : AVIAN SWINE& BLACK PLAGUE FLU RECOVERED IN CORPSES OF 1918 ABOVE THE POLAR CIRCLE !
HONOUR TO POLAND AN TO THE GREAT POLISH PEOPLE !!!
Q : What are the symptoms of the Black Plague ? A : Overwhelming cyanosis
Q : What happens when the victims die in terrible suffering A: The body become immediately black due to the hemorrhagic blood present under the whole body derm
Q : What is the immediate cure in less than 10 minutes, unknown by the Dizeaze Industry (DI) and tis lecherous bed-side mannered Quacks supporting that criminal Pharmacist/Chemist business ! A : Just find it out ! Note As a clue, as easy as the discovery of the Great Sandy Desert immense deposits... surely the noted Australian Mining & Political Criminals, especially that parliamentary filth sitting on the West Australia Parliament on their fucking arses will find out that answer in no time at all .. Just ask them or their official mining heroes for immediate answer !
With kindest regards to all
Note as a bonus under my signature will appears all the goodies the Criminals ' run Labs are putting in their shot, just to be sure the expected results are obtained
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud Australia Mining Pioneer Discoverer & Legal Owner of Telfer Mine (Australia largest Copper & Gold Mine) Nifty (Cu) & Kintyre (U, Th) Mines, all in the Great Sandy Desert Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant Founder of the True Geology
~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One Never Forgiven ~
CONNAISSEZ-VOUS LA SOUPE DU DIABLE ACTUELLEMENT ASSOCIEE AUX VACCINS ?
Ce qui suit est tellement gros qu’on a du mal à y croire.
- ALUMINIUM (adjuvant) : Responsable de dommages cérébraux, suspecté d'être la cause de la maladie d'Alzheimer, de certaines démences, de comas et d'attaques. Responsable également d'allergies cutanées. Lourdement impliqué dans la myofasciite à macrophages. - SULFATE D'AMMONIUM : Suspecté d'attaquer le foie, le système nerveux, le système gastro-intestinal et respiratoire. - BÊTA- PROPIOLACTONE : Connu pour ses propriétés cancérigènes, suspecté d'attaquer le foie, le système respiratoire et gastro- intestinal ainsi que la peau et les organes des sens. - LEVURES GENETIQUEMENT MODIFIEES (OGM !!!), - ADN BACTERIEN OU VIRAL D'ANIMAUX : Substances qui peuvent se combiner à l'ADN des vaccinés et entraîner des mutations génétiques inconnues. - LATEX : qui peut produire des réactions allergiques mettant en péril le pronostic vital - GLUTAMATE DE SODIUM : neurotoxique connu pour ses effets mutagènes, tératogènes, entraînant des malformations et monstruosités et des effets sur la descendance. Responsable d’allergies. - FORMALDEHYDE (formol) : Carcinogène, impliqué dans les leucémies, les cancers du cerveau, du colon, des organes lymphatiques; suspecté d'occasionner des problèmes gastro-intestinaux; poison violent pour le foie, le système immunitaire, le système nerveux, les organes de reproduction. - POLYSORBATE 80 : Connu pour causer des cancers chez les animaux. - TRI(N)BUTYLPHOSPHATE : Suspecté d'être un poison pour les reins et les nerfs. - GLUTARALDEHYDE : Poison, s'il est ingéré; responsable de malformations néonatales chez les animaux d'expérimentation - GELATINE : Produite à partir de certaines parties de la peau des veaux ainsi que des os de bovins déminéralisés et de peau de porcs. Responsable d'allergies. - GENTAMYCINE ET POLYMYXINE B : Antibiotiques toxiques pour les reins et le système nerveux; responsables d'allergies pouvant être mortelles. - MERCURE (conservateur) : Une substance des plus dangereuses, qui a une affinité pour le cerveau, le foie, l'intestin, la mœlle osseuse et les reins. D'infimes quantités peuvent causer des dommages graves au cerveau. Les multiples symptômes de l'intoxication au mercure sont connus y compris l’autisme. - NEOMYCINE : Antibiotique qui perturbe l'absorption de la vitamine B6. Réactions allergiques pouvant être mortelles. Toxique pour les reins et le système nerveux. - PHENOL / PHENOXYETHANOL : Utilisé comme antigel. Toxique capable de dérégler les réponses du système immunitaire. - BORATE DE SODIUM (Borax) : Mort aux rats ( !) contenu dans le très a la mode Gardasil.
CELLULES HUMAINES ET ANIMALES : tissus de foetus; albumine humaine, sang de porc, de cheval, de mouton; cervelle de lapin, de cobaye; reins de chien, coeur de boeuf, reins de singe, embryons de poulets, oeufs de poules et de canards, sérum de veau, etc.
Et puis il y a maintenant la cerise sur le gâteau avec la nanotechnologie « top secret » pouvant être utilisée pour programmer le cerveau…ou le déprogrammer. Surtout, soyez prudents ! N’en privez pas vos enfants !
Ref Michel Dogna avec d’autres informations d’importances sur un génocide vaccinal planifié. http://www.infomicheldogna.net/
>> No, not at all. It was never going to be what the media beat it up to be, >> but it was a major problem with a lot of systems which did not use more >> than 2 digits to record a date. A lot of money and a lot of hard work went >> into sorting these systems out that were going to have issues. If this had >> not been done a much larger amount of money would've been lost when those >> systems started shooting themselves in the foot when the year clicked >> over.
> Do you know of even one system which "shot itself in the foot "? > I'm sure there were at least a few non-Y2K compliant computers at the time.
Actually non-compliant systems were much more of a problem than non-compliant hardware, if a financial system only stored dates with 2 digits it was a disaster waiting to happen. Whilst it wasn't too big a drama to replace these 2 digit dates with 4 digit dates (if the dates were only stored with 2 digits it was already a given no record would go back beyond 1900), but the much bigger problem was trawling through code looking for anything that depended on the date being a 2 digit value and recoding for that.
Hardware was merely a case of if it would not roll over to 2000 correctly (whether it clocked over to '84 or where-ever) it either needed flashing if a flash was available, manual setting (or OS correction which a lot of the OS's did without too much drama after being patched to be aware of the issue) or in extreme cases replacing (perhaps not the cheapest part of the problem to resolve, but certainly the easiest).
In most cases it probably wouldn't have hurt all that badly, on a home computer it would most likely be nothing more than an inconvenience. In our case the fleet was aging anyway, so anything not detected as Y2K compliant it was a good excuse for us to decide it was at end of life anyway and replace it, since we work on 4 year replacement cycles most of the non-compliant stuff was due for replacement by end of 1999 anyway. But with financial systems there was a lot of money waiting to be lost.
As far as knowing of a system where it happened? Not where I worked, we put a lot of time and effort into fixing the problem before it eventuated, and we did come across numerous places where things would've gone to shit if things had not been fixed. I speak purely from the perspective of 'puters and apps running on them however, I have no real idea of how Y2K affected control systems and other electronic gadgetary.
> Warmest Regards
> Bon z0
> "It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps > US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists > worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct > from natural variation." > Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
And lets not forget that sea levels have actually dropped in recent decades, and have been much higher much longer ago.
> Also > Do you know of even one computer crashing in 2000? > I'm sure there were many which weren't Y2K compliant at the time.
You might want to change that claim :-) Remember a lot of machines were running '95 and there was always the Blue Screen of Death.. A lot of operators around December 1999-2000 blamed Y2K for their finger troubles.
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:08:37 +0100, BDR529 <jake.> wrote:
>>Government Shill #2 wrote: >>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:54:28 +1100, "bo n o" <s...@t.com> wrote:
>>>> Y2K was the greatest hoax of the 20th century.
>>> No. Y2K was a very real problem which, if left alone, would have been >>> disastrous. That the world didn't go down in flames is thanks to the >>> hard >>> work of millions of IT specialists around the world.
>>> That the media didn't understand the situation (and you appear to have >>> bought their hype) does not make it a hoax. Only the gullible were >>> hoaxed.
>>Too many words, bonzo is a troll.
> Oh, yeah. I am aware of that. And not a very smart one.
>>Y2K and Climate change are unrelated.
> Well, in as far as, if nothing was done about either then we'd all be in a > bad way, they are sort of related.
> Of course, Bozo doesn't know about the smart people who averted the Y2K > problem and isn't smart enough to understand the climate change issue > either.
I would add that we need SMART PEOPLE to handle climate change as well. The clowns in Canberra don't seem to be doing much. And also like with Y2K I believe Climate Change won't be quite as bad as they say. But we should still do something about it.
|
