Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
2000 AD: A NEW BEGINNING
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 33 of 33 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Si Spurious  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Oct 2000, 08:00
Newsgroups: alt.comics.2000ad
From: "Si Spurious" <s...@wellington-college.berks.sch.uk>
Date: 2000/10/07
Subject: Re: 2000 AD: A NEW BEGINNING

 I have to agree with most of what he said - bring back the Kleggs!   The
point about having another mega-epic with massively-stacked odds is a little
moot:  when has there been a mega-epic *without* things looking grim for
Joe?  And he always turns up at the last minute and watches as Anderson does
all the hard work.  I think we concentrate on four/five parters for a while,
build-up some more of the Big Meg mythos without seeking to radically change
anything.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Morph  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 9 Oct 2000, 08:00
Newsgroups: alt.comics.2000ad
From: disc...@clara.SPAMSPAMAWAY.net (Morph)
Date: 2000/10/09
Subject: Re: 2000 AD: A NEW BEGINNING

Si Spurious wrote:

[snip]

> I have to agree with most of what he said - bring back the Kleggs!   The
>point about having another mega-epic with massively-stacked odds is a little
>moot:  when has there been a mega-epic *without* things looking grim for
>Joe?  And he always turns up at the last minute and watches as Anderson does
>all the hard work.  I think we concentrate on four/five parters for a while,
>build-up some more of the Big Meg mythos without seeking to radically change
>anything.

<rant mode>

Or take some of the stuff that was set-up but never really used - the
Hondo MC2 takeover and all the Sino-Cit background, for example - and
turn it into something interesting.

Dredd himself is, of course, a great character - but Garth Ennis
utterly destroyed the supporting cast during Judgement Day, and while
Wagner's since rebuilt the MC1 Judge cast splendidly (Rico, DeMarco,
Guthrie, Giant junior, Buell, J. Edgar and so on...), and we're
starting to see a few good returning villains (P.J's back, and we've
got Oola and her hubby out there...), there's something missing.

...and I think it's Judges from other cities.

Interesting as the internal MC1 politics sometimes are, foreign Judges
add a whole new aspect. Dredd can't arrest them or shoot them, but you
just *know* he won't agree with them.  It's a great way of giving him
occasional allies and/or antagonists without having to explain why he
hasn't shot or jailed 'em yet.

Hmm. Howzabout reinstating Orlok as a senior Judge in the
post-Glasnost East Meg blok? He's too interesting to waste (in any
sense), but shouldn't be allowed to become bland story-fodder like
Mean Angel an Judge Death. For that matter, why not install him in
somewhere like Banana City (as the sole 'honest' judge)? Or maybe
Casablanca. (Ever since Judgement Day mentioned it, I've had this
weird & totally unjustified image of Casablanca as the not-quite
MegaCity which absorbed & recruited the surviving Judges from all the
cities that didn't survive Judgement Day).

We haven't ever seen JD in Euro-Cit yet, either (have we...?) - and
there has *got* to be a wickedly accurate EU satire lurking in there
somewhere. Judges yelling "freeze perps" in six different official
languages before they shoot, for starters...

        -Morph
---
"When I'm with you I'm all alone
 The lights are on but no-one's home
 Starring in your twilight zone..."
     - Children on Stun, "Whiskey a go-go"


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ken Manson  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 9 Oct 2000, 08:00
Newsgroups: alt.comics.2000ad
From: "Ken Manson" <kenman...@cwcom.net>
Date: 2000/10/09
Subject: Re: 2000 AD: A NEW BEGINNING

>  I have to agree with most of what he said - bring back the Kleggs!   The
> point about having another mega-epic with massively-stacked odds is a
little
> moot:  when has there been a mega-epic *without* things looking grim for
> Joe?  And he always turns up at the last minute and watches as Anderson
does
> all the hard work.  I think we concentrate on four/five parters for a
while,
> build-up some more of the Big Meg mythos without seeking to radically
change
> anything.

Slight brainwave here and vaguely following on from another thread, what if
*Anderson* died?  It could be an opportunity to show part of the human side
of JD as he grieves, mind you, lets face it he killed his own brother so
what's a best friend on top of that.  Just a brief thought on a Monday
night.

Ken


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James Graham  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 10 Oct 2000, 08:00
Newsgroups: alt.comics.2000ad
From: jamesgra...@cix.co.uk (James Graham)
Date: 2000/10/10
Subject: Re: 2000 AD: A NEW BEGINNING
In article <JSqE5.1677$xk1.2581@news2-hme0>, kenman...@cwcom.net (Ken

Manson) wrote:
> Slight brainwave here and vaguely following on from another thread,
> what if
> *Anderson* died?  It could be an opportunity to show part of the human
> side
> of JD as he grieves, mind you, lets face it he killed his own brother so
> what's a best friend on top of that.  Just a brief thought on a Monday
> night.

Anderson hardly counts as Dredd's best friend - useful but annoying
occasional colleague is a more apt description of this opinion of her.

James


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
deegee  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 11 Oct 2000, 05:06
Newsgroups: alt.comics.2000ad
From: "deegee" <dee...@paradise.net.nz>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:04:13 +1300
Local: Wed 11 Oct 2000 05:04
Subject: Re: 2000 AD: A NEW BEGINNING

"James Graham" <jamesgra...@cix.co.uk> wrote in message >
> Anderson hardly counts as Dredd's best friend - useful but annoying
> occasional colleague is a more apt description of this opinion of her.

Perhaps not his best friend but a close one nevertheless.
End pages of 'Satan' where Anderson lies broken & bleeding after defeating
the demon Dredd says
    " Remember what I said - that what you mistook for our friendship was
merely my tolerance of your defective personality? I was wrong. I apologise"
    Men don't make sincere apologies like that to people they don't care
about.

Verity


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James Graham  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 11 Oct 2000, 08:00
Newsgroups: alt.comics.2000ad
From: jamesgra...@cix.co.uk (James Graham)
Date: 2000/10/11
Subject: Re: 2000 AD: A NEW BEGINNING
In article <971237185.94...@shelley.paradise.net.nz>,

Good point.

On the other hand I consider Satan (and indeed a lot of the "excellent"
Anderson stuff) to be so appalling to not be worth bothering with. And its
precisely this sort of wishy-washy crap that I hate about it.

James


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
deegee  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 12 Oct 2000, 06:58
Newsgroups: alt.comics.2000ad
From: "deegee" <dee...@paradise.net.nz>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 18:40:38 +1300
Local: Thurs 12 Oct 2000 06:40
Subject: Re: 2000 AD: A NEW BEGINNING

"James Graham" <jamesgra...@cix.co.uk> wrote in message

news:memo.20001011205748.19899C@jamesgraham.compulink.co.uk...

> Good point.

> On the other hand I consider Satan (and indeed a lot of the "excellent"
> Anderson stuff) to be so appalling to not be worth bothering with. And its
> precisely this sort of wishy-washy crap that I hate about it.

> James

Well, at least the drawing wasn't too bad - will you give me that at least?!
Verity

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James Graham  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 12 Oct 2000, 08:00
Newsgroups: alt.comics.2000ad
From: jamesgra...@cix.co.uk (James Graham)
Date: 2000/10/12
Subject: Re: 2000 AD: A NEW BEGINNING
In article <971330292.227...@shelley.paradise.net.nz>,

dee...@paradise.net.nz (deegee) wrote:
> Well, at least the drawing wasn't too bad - will you give me that at
> least?!

Gladly.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google