alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian Google Group

Re: Goobernicus is Alive and Well....................

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Sun, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:17 UT

I'm thinking of Goo the pet food expert.
LOL!!
C'mon, I don't agree with everything Ball says, but Harrison is the master
of stupid. You're some kind of opponent of animal exploitation aren't you?
What are you doing in bed with a cock fighter who believes we do animals a
favour by eating them. Ball must really have your panties in a twist.

Re: Goobernicus is Alive and Well....................

bunghole-jon...@lycos.com (Mr.Smartypants) — Sat, 11 Nov 2009 20:56:49 UT

I'm thinking of Goo the pet food expert.
LOL!!

Re: Faith required to be a strong atheist!

p...@hotmail.com (This is not a love song) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 22:38:25 UT

That's not rare. :)

Re: Faith required to be a strong atheist!

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 21:00:38 UT

He's a rare combination, a retard troll.

Re: Goobernicus is Alive and Well....................

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 20:59:47 UT

LOL!!
Re-read some of his posts. He proved nothing except that he is the
absolute MASTER OF OUTSTUPIDIFICATION.
--------------->
You're thinking of Harrison.

Re: Goobernicus is Alive and Well....................

bunghole-jon...@lycos.com (Mr.Smartypants) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 17:58:04 UT

LOL!!
Re-read some of his posts. He proved nothing except that he is the
absolute MASTER OF OUTSTUPIDIFICATION.

Re: Faith required to be a strong atheist!

p...@hotmail.com (This is not a love song) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 11:24:08 UT

"Retard" means slow, that is that retards eventually get it. dh doesn't
beleive that bull he's spouting. He's a troll with the intent of offending.
So he will never get your arguments. Retards are usually decent people.
Trolls have no such luxury.

Re: Faith required to be a strong atheist!

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 10:42:02 UT

<dh@.> wrote
You're too stupid to live. Believing in unproven concepts is faith, not
believing in unproven concepts is just rationality.

Re: Faith required to be a strong atheist!

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 06:12:53 UT

"Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote
No offense to self-respecting retards..

Re: Faith required to be a strong atheist!

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 00:29:22 UT

Which is it?
You're a retard.

Re: Goobernicus is Alive and Well....................

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 00:28:23 UT

Yep, rock bottom.

Re: Goobernicus is Alive and Well....................

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 00:27:35 UT

Every time he proved beyond a doubt that life cannot be a benefit.

Re: Faith required to be a strong atheist!

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 00:25:49 UT

Consumer choices are not the LoL.
Animals' lives are not the LoL.
You didn't answer the question, as usual, and you never will. There is no
answer, because what you suggest is meaningless drivel.
<no response>
It's a fact you can't grasp.
It's not necessary, it's meaningless.
That thought does nothing to help any animal. It is also increasingly untrue

Re: Faith required to be a strong atheist!

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 00:17:48 UT

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zz

Re: Faith required to be a strong atheist!

n...@email.com (Dutch) — Fri, 11 Nov 2009 00:16:53 UT

You take things into consideration irrationally and illegitimately because
you have deluded yourself into believing something ridiculous, and you have
defended it for so long you're stuck, similar to the ARA who is stuck by his
history of irrational rhetoric.
There is no supportable reason to "consider" the life of an animal (aka the