> >>>>Anyone who followed aaev knows that both of you suffered relentless > >>>>humiliation at the hands of JB.
> >>> LOL!!!!!!!!!!! That is quite possibly the stupidest most > >>>hilarious thing you've ever written in your life.
> >>>>Nobody else knows what you're talking > >>>>about. Neither group cares.
> >>>>These exhanges between the two of you can only be viewed as mutual > >>>>wound > >>>>licking,
> >>> LOL!!!! This is almost as much fun as having Goo do it. > >>>Here's a fun idea: Try providing ANY examples of the Goober > >>>"wounding" either one of us.
> >>>>the comiserations of two badly beaten dormats.
> >>>>So you are telling us that the cow was purposely bred into existance > >>>>and fed and watered for 12 years only to be sold at the lowest price > >>>>in > >>>>the beef industry......and all that done with the singular purpose of > >>>>supplying the pet food industry?
> >>>> You also said cows are raised for 12 years specifically to become PET > >>>> FOOD.
> >>>Some are. > >>>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > >>>LOL!!! What a stupid Goober! Now back to the challenge: Try > >>>providing some examples of either of us being "badly beaten" by > >>>Goo. GO:
> >>>>So I repeat, who are you trying to convince that you came out of those > >>>>days > >>>>with any self respect, yourself or each other?
> >>> All we had to do was challenge the Goober to try explaining > >>>his idiocy, and he showed himself to be the idiot. Goo never came > >>>out on top afaik. For one thing Goo always lied, so he lost by > >>>forfeit right from the start. For another thing when the Goober > >>>did manage to persuade people to believe his lies in reality he > >>>STILL lost by forfeit even when there was someone around who was > >>>stupid enough to believe him. Goo outstupided himself time and > >>>time again, usually by the blatancy of his dishonesty. I feel > >>>very safe in saying that you can't give a single example of a > >>>time that Goo came out on top of a disagreement with myself, or > >>>probably with Mr Smartypants either.
> >>Every single time.
> > That's a blatant lie, no doubt about it.
> Every time he proved beyond a doubt that life cannot be a benefit.-
LOL!!
Re-read some of his posts. He proved nothing except that he is the absolute MASTER OF OUTSTUPIDIFICATION. --------------->
> > >>>>Anyone who followed aaev knows that both of you suffered relentless > > >>>>humiliation at the hands of JB.
> > >>> LOL!!!!!!!!!!! That is quite possibly the stupidest most > > >>>hilarious thing you've ever written in your life.
> > >>>>Nobody else knows what you're talking > > >>>>about. Neither group cares.
> > >>>>These exhanges between the two of you can only be viewed as mutual > > >>>>wound > > >>>>licking,
> > >>> LOL!!!! This is almost as much fun as having Goo do it. > > >>>Here's a fun idea: Try providing ANY examples of the Goober > > >>>"wounding" either one of us.
> > >>>>the comiserations of two badly beaten dormats.
> > >>>>So you are telling us that the cow was purposely bred into existance > > >>>>and fed and watered for 12 years only to be sold at the lowest price > > >>>>in > > >>>>the beef industry......and all that done with the singular purpose of > > >>>>supplying the pet food industry?
> > >>>> You also said cows are raised for 12 years specifically to become PET > > >>>> FOOD.
> > >>>Some are. > > >>>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > > >>>LOL!!! What a stupid Goober! Now back to the challenge: Try > > >>>providing some examples of either of us being "badly beaten" by > > >>>Goo. GO:
> > >>>>So I repeat, who are you trying to convince that you came out of those > > >>>>days > > >>>>with any self respect, yourself or each other?
> > >>> All we had to do was challenge the Goober to try explaining > > >>>his idiocy, and he showed himself to be the idiot. Goo never came > > >>>out on top afaik. For one thing Goo always lied, so he lost by > > >>>forfeit right from the start. For another thing when the Goober > > >>>did manage to persuade people to believe his lies in reality he > > >>>STILL lost by forfeit even when there was someone around who was > > >>>stupid enough to believe him. Goo outstupided himself time and > > >>>time again, usually by the blatancy of his dishonesty. I feel > > >>>very safe in saying that you can't give a single example of a > > >>>time that Goo came out on top of a disagreement with myself, or > > >>>probably with Mr Smartypants either.
> > >>Every single time.
> > > That's a blatant lie, no doubt about it.
> > Every time he proved beyond a doubt that life cannot be a benefit.-
> LOL!!
> Re-read some of his posts. He proved nothing except that he is the > absolute MASTER OF OUTSTUPIDIFICATION. > --------------->
> > >>>>Anyone who followed aaev knows that both of you suffered relentless > > >>>>humiliation at the hands of JB.
> > >>> LOL!!!!!!!!!!! That is quite possibly the stupidest most > > >>>hilarious thing you've ever written in your life.
> > >>>>Nobody else knows what you're talking > > >>>>about. Neither group cares.
> > >>>>These exhanges between the two of you can only be viewed as mutual > > >>>>wound > > >>>>licking,
> > >>> LOL!!!! This is almost as much fun as having Goo do it. > > >>>Here's a fun idea: Try providing ANY examples of the Goober > > >>>"wounding" either one of us.
> > >>>>the comiserations of two badly beaten dormats.
> > >>>>So you are telling us that the cow was purposely bred into existance > > >>>>and fed and watered for 12 years only to be sold at the lowest price > > >>>>in > > >>>>the beef industry......and all that done with the singular purpose > > >>>>of > > >>>>supplying the pet food industry?
> > >>>> You also said cows are raised for 12 years specifically to become > > >>>> PET > > >>>> FOOD.
> > >>>Some are. > > >>>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > > >>>LOL!!! What a stupid Goober! Now back to the challenge: Try > > >>>providing some examples of either of us being "badly beaten" by > > >>>Goo. GO:
> > >>>>So I repeat, who are you trying to convince that you came out of > > >>>>those > > >>>>days > > >>>>with any self respect, yourself or each other?
> > >>> All we had to do was challenge the Goober to try explaining > > >>>his idiocy, and he showed himself to be the idiot. Goo never came > > >>>out on top afaik. For one thing Goo always lied, so he lost by > > >>>forfeit right from the start. For another thing when the Goober > > >>>did manage to persuade people to believe his lies in reality he > > >>>STILL lost by forfeit even when there was someone around who was > > >>>stupid enough to believe him. Goo outstupided himself time and > > >>>time again, usually by the blatancy of his dishonesty. I feel > > >>>very safe in saying that you can't give a single example of a > > >>>time that Goo came out on top of a disagreement with myself, or > > >>>probably with Mr Smartypants either.
> > >>Every single time.
> > > That's a blatant lie, no doubt about it.
> > Every time he proved beyond a doubt that life cannot be a benefit.-
> LOL!!
> Re-read some of his posts. He proved nothing except that he is the > absolute MASTER OF OUTSTUPIDIFICATION. > --------------->
> You're thinking of Harrison.-
I'm thinking of Goo the pet food expert.
LOL!!
C'mon, I don't agree with everything Ball says, but Harrison is the master of stupid. You're some kind of opponent of animal exploitation aren't you? What are you doing in bed with a cock fighter who believes we do animals a favour by eating them. Ball must really have your panties in a twist.
> > > >>>>Anyone who followed aaev knows that both of you suffered relentless > > > >>>>humiliation at the hands of JB.
> > > >>> LOL!!!!!!!!!!! That is quite possibly the stupidest most > > > >>>hilarious thing you've ever written in your life.
> > > >>>>Nobody else knows what you're talking > > > >>>>about. Neither group cares.
> > > >>>>These exhanges between the two of you can only be viewed as mutual > > > >>>>wound > > > >>>>licking,
> > > >>> LOL!!!! This is almost as much fun as having Goo do it. > > > >>>Here's a fun idea: Try providing ANY examples of the Goober > > > >>>"wounding" either one of us.
> > > >>>>the comiserations of two badly beaten dormats.
> > > >>>>So you are telling us that the cow was purposely bred into existance > > > >>>>and fed and watered for 12 years only to be sold at the lowest price > > > >>>>in > > > >>>>the beef industry......and all that done with the singular purpose > > > >>>>of > > > >>>>supplying the pet food industry?
> > > >>>> You also said cows are raised for 12 years specifically to become > > > >>>> PET > > > >>>> FOOD.
> > > >>>Some are. > > > >>>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > > > >>>LOL!!! What a stupid Goober! Now back to the challenge: Try > > > >>>providing some examples of either of us being "badly beaten" by > > > >>>Goo. GO:
> > > >>>>So I repeat, who are you trying to convince that you came out of > > > >>>>those > > > >>>>days > > > >>>>with any self respect, yourself or each other?
> > > >>> All we had to do was challenge the Goober to try explaining > > > >>>his idiocy, and he showed himself to be the idiot. Goo never came > > > >>>out on top afaik. For one thing Goo always lied, so he lost by > > > >>>forfeit right from the start. For another thing when the Goober > > > >>>did manage to persuade people to believe his lies in reality he > > > >>>STILL lost by forfeit even when there was someone around who was > > > >>>stupid enough to believe him. Goo outstupided himself time and > > > >>>time again, usually by the blatancy of his dishonesty. I feel > > > >>>very safe in saying that you can't give a single example of a > > > >>>time that Goo came out on top of a disagreement with myself, or > > > >>>probably with Mr Smartypants either.
> > > >>Every single time.
> > > > That's a blatant lie, no doubt about it.
> > > Every time he proved beyond a doubt that life cannot be a benefit.-
> > LOL!!
> > Re-read some of his posts. He proved nothing except that he is the > > absolute MASTER OF OUTSTUPIDIFICATION. > > --------------->
> > You're thinking of Harrison.-
> I'm thinking of Goo the pet food expert.
> LOL!!
> C'mon, I don't agree with everything Ball says, but Harrison is the master > of stupid. You're some kind of opponent of animal exploitation aren't you? > What are you doing in bed with a cock fighter who believes we do animals a > favour by eating them. Ball must really have your panties in a twist.-
Hasn't it penetrated your tiny mind that Goo is so good at outstupiding himself that Dave and I on opposite ends of the spectrum both can agree on that fact?
"Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote On Nov 7, 6:55 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
> C'mon, I don't agree with everything Ball says, but Harrison is the master > of stupid. You're some kind of opponent of animal exploitation aren't you? > What are you doing in bed with a cock fighter who believes we do animals a > favour by eating them. Ball must really have your panties in a twist.-
Hasn't it penetrated your tiny mind that Goo is so good at outstupiding himself that Dave and I on opposite ends of the spectrum both can agree on that fact? ----------------------->
Sorry, that doesn't add up. You forget, I witnessed the whole thing. If this was just about somebody being "stupid" you wouldn't be in league with someone so diametrically opposed to what you believe. You are two guys who have had the royal piss taken out of them and you're licking each others wounds.
> "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote > On Nov 7, 6:55 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
> > C'mon, I don't agree with everything Ball says, but Harrison is the master > > of stupid. You're some kind of opponent of animal exploitation aren't you? > > What are you doing in bed with a cock fighter who believes we do animals a > > favour by eating them. Ball must really have your panties in a twist.-
> Hasn't it penetrated your tiny mind that Goo is so good at > outstupiding himself that Dave and I on opposite ends of the spectrum > both can agree on that fact? > ----------------------->
> Sorry, that doesn't add up. You forget, I witnessed the whole thing. If this > was just about somebody being "stupid" you wouldn't be in league with > someone so diametrically opposed to what you believe. You are two guys who > have had the royal piss taken out of them and you're licking each others > wounds.
> "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote > On Nov 7, 6:55 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
> > C'mon, I don't agree with everything Ball says, but Harrison is the > > master > > of stupid. You're some kind of opponent of animal exploitation aren't > > you? > > What are you doing in bed with a cock fighter who believes we do animals > > a > > favour by eating them. Ball must really have your panties in a twist.-
> Hasn't it penetrated your tiny mind that Goo is so good at > outstupiding himself that Dave and I on opposite ends of the spectrum > both can agree on that fact? > ----------------------->
> Sorry, that doesn't add up. You forget, I witnessed the whole thing. If > this > was just about somebody being "stupid" you wouldn't be in league with > someone so diametrically opposed to what you believe. You are two guys who > have had the royal piss taken out of them and you're licking each others > wounds.
>> >>>>So you are telling us that the cow was purposely bred into existance >> >>>>and fed and watered for 12 years only to be sold at the lowest price in >> >>>>the beef industry......and all that done with the singular purpose of >> >>>>supplying the pet food industry?
>> >>>> You also said cows are raised for 12 years specifically to become PET >> >>>> FOOD.
>> >>>Some are. >> >>>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ >> >>>LOL!!! What a stupid Goober! Now back to the challenge: Try >> >>>providing some examples of either of us being "badly beaten" by >> >>>Goo. GO:
>> >>>>So I repeat, who are you trying to convince that you came out of those >> >>>>days >> >>>>with any self respect, yourself or each other?
>> >>> All we had to do was challenge the Goober to try explaining >> >>>his idiocy, and he showed himself to be the idiot. Goo never came >> >>>out on top afaik. For one thing Goo always lied, so he lost by >> >>>forfeit right from the start. For another thing when the Goober >> >>>did manage to persuade people to believe his lies in reality he >> >>>STILL lost by forfeit even when there was someone around who was >> >>>stupid enough to believe him. Goo outstupided himself time and >> >>>time again, usually by the blatancy of his dishonesty. I feel >> >>>very safe in saying that you can't give a single example of a >> >>>time that Goo came out on top of a disagreement with myself, or >> >>>probably with Mr Smartypants either.
>> >>Every single time.
>> > That's a blatant lie, no doubt about it.
>> Every time he proved beyond a doubt that life cannot be a benefit.-
>LOL!!
>Re-read some of his posts.
That is an excellent suggestion. What fun that once again we're enjoying Goobal idiotics, and with his boy "Dutch" still around to attempt some defence for it...or more likely NOT. Anyway, we see that the Goober disagrees with himself like his boy does: _________________________________________________________ "Life is not a benefit for farm animals." - Goo
"Their lives may be pleasant for them." - Goo
""Life", by which you mean coming into existence, is not a benefit at all" - Goo
"We ARE NOT, and NEVER WERE, talking about whether existing animals "benefit" from living." - Goo
"Those "lives of positive value" are only meaningful *IF* the livestock exist. " - Goo
"The topic is not and never has been whether or not existing animals enjoy living." - Goo
"IF they exist, then they can benefit (or not) from the aspects of their lives." - Goo
"No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo
"We are not and never were talking about benefits for existing entities" - Goo
"Coming into existence is not a benefit to them" - Goo ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ Goo even disagrees with himself about whether or not their lives should be taken into consideration at all: _________________________________________________________ "The opportunity for potential livestock to "get to experience life" deserves *NO* moral consideration whatever" - Goo
"I give the lives of animals that exist *LOTS* of consideration." - Goo
"the "getting to experience life" deserves NO moral consideration, and is given none" - Goo
"I also give the not-yet-begun lives of animals that are "in the pipeline", so to speak, a lot of consideration" - Goo
"There is no "consideration" to be given." - Goo ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ and here's a classic that Mr Smartypants reminded us of: _________________________________________________________ "Set your clock back by an hour" - Goo
"I didn't say to set your clock back an hour" - Goo ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ and then there's Goo's amusing though pathetic obsession with his supposed "pre-existent state", on which his entire "argument" is based: _________________________________________________________ "The only way that the concept "benefit from existence" can begin to make sense semantically is if one assumes a pre-existent state" - Goo
"When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the existence we know" - Goo
"I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"" - Goo
"we don't know if that move improves its welfare" - Goo ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ Looking back we remember: Wow, what an idiot.
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:54:03 -0800, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote: >>"Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote >>On Nov 7, 6:55 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote: >>> C'mon, I don't agree with everything Ball says, but Harrison is the master >>> of stupid. You're some kind of opponent of animal exploitation aren't you? >>> What are you doing in bed with a cock fighter who believes we do animals a >>> favour by eating them. Ball must really have your panties in a twist.-
>>Hasn't it penetrated your tiny mind that Goo is so good at >>outstupiding himself that Dave and I on opposite ends of the spectrum >>both can agree on that fact? >----------------------->
>Sorry, that doesn't add up.
That's the way it is you poor fool. We're enjoying the same thing with you too btw.
>You forget, I witnessed the whole thing.
Your love of the Goober prevented you from correctly interpreting what you witnessed, or you're lying about it. Or most likely it's a combination of both.
>If this >was just about somebody being "stupid" you wouldn't be in league with >someone so diametrically opposed to what you believe.
Now wtf are you trying to say that differing beliefs about what is and is not cruel to animals, has to do with what people with such differing beliefs think about a lying self-outstupidifying slimebag like the Goober?
>You are two guys who >have had the royal piss taken out of them
> >> >>>>So you are telling us that the cow was purposely bred into existance > >> >>>>and fed and watered for 12 years only to be sold at the lowest price in > >> >>>>the beef industry......and all that done with the singular purpose of > >> >>>>supplying the pet food industry?
> >> >>>> You also said cows are raised for 12 years specifically to become PET > >> >>>> FOOD.
> >> >>>Some are. > >> >>>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > >> >>>LOL!!! What a stupid Goober! Now back to the challenge: Try > >> >>>providing some examples of either of us being "badly beaten" by > >> >>>Goo. GO:
> >> >>>>So I repeat, who are you trying to convince that you came out of those > >> >>>>days > >> >>>>with any self respect, yourself or each other?
> >> >>> All we had to do was challenge the Goober to try explaining > >> >>>his idiocy, and he showed himself to be the idiot. Goo never came > >> >>>out on top afaik. For one thing Goo always lied, so he lost by > >> >>>forfeit right from the start. For another thing when the Goober > >> >>>did manage to persuade people to believe his lies in reality he > >> >>>STILL lost by forfeit even when there was someone around who was > >> >>>stupid enough to believe him. Goo outstupided himself time and > >> >>>time again, usually by the blatancy of his dishonesty. I feel > >> >>>very safe in saying that you can't give a single example of a > >> >>>time that Goo came out on top of a disagreement with myself, or > >> >>>probably with Mr Smartypants either.
> >> >>Every single time.
> >> > That's a blatant lie, no doubt about it.
> >> Every time he proved beyond a doubt that life cannot be a benefit.-
> >LOL!!
> >Re-read some of his posts.
> That is an excellent suggestion. What fun that once again > we're enjoying Goobal idiotics, and with his boy "Dutch" still > around to attempt some defence for it...or more likely NOT. > Anyway, we see that the Goober disagrees with himself like his > boy does: > _________________________________________________________ > "Life is not a benefit for farm animals." - Goo
> "Their lives may be pleasant for them." - Goo
> ""Life", by which you mean coming into existence, is not > a benefit at all" - Goo
> "We ARE NOT, and NEVER WERE, talking about whether > existing animals "benefit" from living." - Goo
> "Those "lives of positive value" are only meaningful > *IF* the livestock exist. " - Goo
> "The topic is not and never has been whether or not > existing animals enjoy living." - Goo
> "IF they exist, then they can benefit (or not) from the > aspects of their lives." - Goo
> "No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo
> "We are not and never were talking about benefits for > existing entities" - Goo
> "Coming into existence is not a benefit to them" - Goo > ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > Goo even disagrees with himself about whether or not their lives > should be taken into consideration at all: > _________________________________________________________ > "The opportunity for potential livestock to "get to > experience life" deserves *NO* moral consideration > whatever" - Goo
> "I give the lives of animals that exist *LOTS* > of consideration." - Goo
> "the "getting to experience life" deserves NO > moral consideration, and is given none" - Goo
> "I also give the not-yet-begun lives of animals > that are "in the pipeline", so to speak, a lot of > consideration" - Goo
> "There is no "consideration" to be given." - Goo > ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > and here's a classic that Mr Smartypants reminded us of: > _________________________________________________________ > "Set your clock back by an hour" - Goo
> "I didn't say to set your clock back an hour" - Goo > ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > and then there's Goo's amusing though pathetic obsession with his > supposed "pre-existent state", on which his entire "argument" is > based: > _________________________________________________________ > "The only way that the concept "benefit from existence" > can begin to make sense semantically is if one assumes > a pre-existent state" - Goo
> "When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the > existence we know" - Goo
> "I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"" - Goo
> "we don't know if that move improves its welfare" - Goo > ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ > Looking back we remember: Wow, what an idiot.-
Indeed we do remember.......and his Goobal antics will outlive the Goo.
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:39:53 -0800, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote: >On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:49:28 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 "Mr.Smartypants" suggested:
>>>Re-read some of his posts.
>> That is an excellent suggestion. What fun that once again >>we're enjoying Goobal idiotics, and with his boy "Dutch" still >>around to attempt some defence for it...or more likely NOT. >>Anyway, we see that the Goober disagrees with himself like his >>boy does: >>_________________________________________________________ >>"Life is not a benefit for farm animals." - Goo
>>"Their lives may be pleasant for them." - Goo
>>""Life", by which you mean coming into existence, is not >>a benefit at all" - Goo
>>"We ARE NOT, and NEVER WERE, talking about whether >>existing animals "benefit" from living." - Goo
>>"Those "lives of positive value" are only meaningful >>*IF* the livestock exist. " - Goo
>>"The topic is not and never has been whether or not >>existing animals enjoy living." - Goo
>>"IF they exist, then they can benefit (or not) from the >>aspects of their lives." - Goo
>>"No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo
>>"We are not and never were talking about benefits for >>existing entities" - Goo
>>"Coming into existence is not a benefit to them" - Goo >>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ >>Goo even disagrees with himself about whether or not their lives >>should be taken into consideration at all: >>_________________________________________________________ >>"The opportunity for potential livestock to "get to >>experience life" deserves *NO* moral consideration >>whatever" - Goo
>>"I give the lives of animals that exist *LOTS* >>of consideration." - Goo
>>"the "getting to experience life" deserves NO >>moral consideration, and is given none" - Goo
>>"I also give the not-yet-begun lives of animals >>that are "in the pipeline", so to speak, a lot of >>consideration" - Goo
>>"There is no "consideration" to be given." - Goo >>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ >>and here's a classic that Mr Smartypants reminded us of: >>_________________________________________________________ >>"Set your clock back by an hour" - Goo
>>"I didn't say to set your clock back an hour" - Goo >>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ >>and then there's Goo's amusing though pathetic obsession with his >>supposed "pre-existent state", on which his entire "argument" is >>based: >>_________________________________________________________ >>"The only way that the concept "benefit from existence" >>can begin to make sense semantically is if one assumes >>a pre-existent state" - Goo
>>"When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the >>existence we know" - Goo
>>"I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"" - Goo
>>"we don't know if that move improves its welfare" - Goo >>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ >>Looking back we remember: Wow, what an idiot.
>Keep telling yourself that, over and and over and over and over......
LOL! I keep proving it over and and over and over and over.....
"Dogs NEVER anticipate, nor do cats, or cattle, or any other animal you've ever encountered." - Goo
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:41:48 -0800, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote: ><dh@.> wrote >> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:54:03 -0800, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>You are two guys who >>>have had the royal piss taken out of them
>> There's no evidence of that. None.
>The evidence is overwhelming.
Try providing some. You can't because there is none. It sure would be fun to see you try presenting something, sometime, but no...never...not you.
>> >> >>>>So you are telling us that the cow was purposely bred into existance >> >> >>>>and fed and watered for 12 years only to be sold at the lowest price in >> >> >>>>the beef industry......and all that done with the singular purpose of >> >> >>>>supplying the pet food industry?
>> >> >>>> You also said cows are raised for 12 years specifically to become PET >> >> >>>> FOOD.
>> >> >>>Some are. >> >> >>>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ >> >> >>>LOL!!! What a stupid Goober! Now back to the challenge: Try >> >> >>>providing some examples of either of us being "badly beaten" by >> >> >>>Goo. GO:
>> >> >>>>So I repeat, who are you trying to convince that you came out of those >> >> >>>>days >> >> >>>>with any self respect, yourself or each other?
>> >> >>> All we had to do was challenge the Goober to try explaining >> >> >>>his idiocy, and he showed himself to be the idiot. Goo never came >> >> >>>out on top afaik. For one thing Goo always lied, so he lost by >> >> >>>forfeit right from the start. For another thing when the Goober >> >> >>>did manage to persuade people to believe his lies in reality he >> >> >>>STILL lost by forfeit even when there was someone around who was >> >> >>>stupid enough to believe him. Goo outstupided himself time and >> >> >>>time again, usually by the blatancy of his dishonesty. I feel >> >> >>>very safe in saying that you can't give a single example of a >> >> >>>time that Goo came out on top of a disagreement with myself, or >> >> >>>probably with Mr Smartypants either.
>> >> >>Every single time.
>> >> > That's a blatant lie, no doubt about it.
>> >> Every time he proved beyond a doubt that life cannot be a benefit.-
>> >LOL!!
>> >Re-read some of his posts.
>> That is an excellent suggestion. What fun that once again >> we're enjoying Goobal idiotics, and with his boy "Dutch" still >> around to attempt some defence for it...or more likely NOT. >> Anyway, we see that the Goober disagrees with himself like his >> boy does: >> _________________________________________________________ >> "Life is not a benefit for farm animals." - Goo
>> "Their lives may be pleasant for them." - Goo
>> ""Life", by which you mean coming into existence, is not >> a benefit at all" - Goo
>> "We ARE NOT, and NEVER WERE, talking about whether >> existing animals "benefit" from living." - Goo
>> "Those "lives of positive value" are only meaningful >> *IF* the livestock exist. " - Goo
>> "The topic is not and never has been whether or not >> existing animals enjoy living." - Goo
>> "IF they exist, then they can benefit (or not) from the >> aspects of their lives." - Goo
>> "No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo
>> "We are not and never were talking about benefits for >> existing entities" - Goo
>> "Coming into existence is not a benefit to them" - Goo >> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ >> Goo even disagrees with himself about whether or not their lives >> should be taken into consideration at all: >> _________________________________________________________ >> "The opportunity for potential livestock to "get to >> experience life" deserves *NO* moral consideration >> whatever" - Goo
>> "I give the lives of animals that exist *LOTS* >> of consideration." - Goo
>> "the "getting to experience life" deserves NO >> moral consideration, and is given none" - Goo
>> "I also give the not-yet-begun lives of animals >> that are "in the pipeline", so to speak, a lot of >> consideration" - Goo
>> "There is no "consideration" to be given." - Goo >> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ >> and here's a classic that Mr Smartypants reminded us of: >> _________________________________________________________ >> "Set your clock back by an hour" - Goo
>> "I didn't say to set your clock back an hour" - Goo >> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ >> and then there's Goo's amusing though pathetic obsession with his >> supposed "pre-existent state", on which his entire "argument" is >> based: >> _________________________________________________________ >> "The only way that the concept "benefit from existence" >> can begin to make sense semantically is if one assumes >> a pre-existent state" - Goo
>> "When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the >> existence we know" - Goo
>> "I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"" - Goo
>> "we don't know if that move improves its welfare" - Goo >> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ >> Looking back we remember: Wow, what an idiot.-
>Indeed we do remember.......and his Goobal antics will outlive the >Goo.
I sure wish "Dutch" would try to defend some of the stupidity instead of just lying about the Goober having kicked some ass somewhere. Could he really not recognise the truth when it's laid out before him? Or does he want people to believe he's stupider than he actually is and can't see the stupidity in Goo? It always gets back to that question with these goobers.
> > On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:54:03 -0800, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote: > >>You are two guys who > >>have had the royal piss taken out of them
> > There's no evidence of that. None.
> The evidence is overwhelming.
This evidence:?
"When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the existence we know" - Goo
"I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"" - Goo
How the f*** do you keep a straight face when you're trying to defend the Goo?
I'd be rolling on the floor pissing my pants laughing if I tried it.
-------------------
You probably piss your pants but that's not the reason.
No, your lame attempts to paste together some quotes that make it look like you held your own in those discussions is not at all convincing. You keep forgetting, I was there.
Ball made a laughing stock out of fuckwit and used you for a punching bag. It was fun to watch.
"Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote On Nov 12, 10:08 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
> <dh@.> wrote>>Keep telling yourself that, over and and over and over and > over......
> > LOL! I keep
> Telling yourself over and over and over... The human ego defends itself > any > way it can.
> Now that he's not here to make a daily laughing stock of you, you can > practice this creative rewriting of history.
What re-writing?
The quotes are presented exactly as the Goober made them. --------------->
Where to begin... The quotes are out of context. The fuckwit got consistently and severely manhandled by Ball, at every turn and in every possible way. You were nothing more than an irrelevant sidelight. THAT is the reality, YOU should forget it and move on, because pretending anything else and throwing your lot in with usenet's biggest animal abuser and creep is just plain stupid.
> "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote > On Nov 12, 10:08 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
> > <dh@.> wrote>>Keep telling yourself that, over and and over and over and > > over......
> > > LOL! I keep
> > Telling yourself over and over and over... The human ego defends itself > > any > > way it can.
> > Now that he's not here to make a daily laughing stock of you, you can > > practice this creative rewriting of history.
> What re-writing?
> The quotes are presented exactly as the Goober made them. > --------------->
> Where to begin... The quotes are out of context. The fuckwit got > consistently and severely manhandled by Ball, at every turn and in every > possible way. You were nothing more than an irrelevant sidelight. THAT is > the reality, YOU should forget it and move on, because pretending anything > else and throwing your lot in with usenet's biggest animal abuser and creep > is just plain stupid.
Once again for those who are mentally diminished, Dave and I will likely NEVER see eye-to-eye on animal welfare or rights but we do agree on one thing for sure:
Goobernicus (Jonny Ball) is the master of OUTSTUPIDIFCATION of himself............and it appears you'd like him to be your mentor.
<bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote: >On Nov 13, 2:24 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote: >> "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote >> On Nov 12, 10:08 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>> > <dh@.> wrote>>Keep telling yourself that, over and and over and over and >> > over......
>> > > LOL! I keep
>> > Telling yourself over and over and over... The human ego defends itself >> > any >> > way it can.
>> > Now that he's not here to make a daily laughing stock of you, you can >> > practice this creative rewriting of history.
>> What re-writing?
>> The quotes are presented exactly as the Goober made them. >> --------------->
>> Where to begin... The quotes are out of context. The fuckwit got >> consistently and severely manhandled by Ball, at every turn and in every >> possible way. You were nothing more than an irrelevant sidelight. THAT is >> the reality, YOU should forget it and move on, because pretending anything >> else and throwing your lot in with usenet's biggest animal abuser and creep >> is just plain stupid.
>Once again for those who are mentally diminished, Dave and I will >likely NEVER see eye-to-eye on animal welfare or rights but we do >agree on one thing for sure:
>Goobernicus (Jonny Ball) is the master of OUTSTUPIDIFCATION of >himself............and it appears you'd like him to be your mentor.
You can't hold a candle to The Man! He just wraps you up in those tin-foil hats and flack-jackets and watches you wiggle and squirm while trying to reassemble your fractured knowledge, logic and opinions.
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:37:15 -0800 (PST), "Mr.Smartypants"
> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote: > >On Nov 13, 2:24 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote: > >> "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote > >> On Nov 12, 10:08 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
> >> > <dh@.> wrote>>Keep telling yourself that, over and and over and over and > >> > over......
> >> > > LOL! I keep
> >> > Telling yourself over and over and over... The human ego defends itself > >> > any > >> > way it can.
> >> > Now that he's not here to make a daily laughing stock of you, you can > >> > practice this creative rewriting of history.
> >> What re-writing?
> >> The quotes are presented exactly as the Goober made them. > >> --------------->
> >> Where to begin... The quotes are out of context. The fuckwit got > >> consistently and severely manhandled by Ball, at every turn and in every > >> possible way. You were nothing more than an irrelevant sidelight. THAT is > >> the reality, YOU should forget it and move on, because pretending anything > >> else and throwing your lot in with usenet's biggest animal abuser and creep > >> is just plain stupid.
> >Once again for those who are mentally diminished, Dave and I will > >likely NEVER see eye-to-eye on animal welfare or rights but we do > >agree on one thing for sure:
> >Goobernicus (Jonny Ball) is the master of OUTSTUPIDIFCATION of > >himself............and it appears you'd like him to be your mentor.
> You can't hold a candle to The Man! He just wraps you up in those > tin-foil hats and flack-jackets and watches you wiggle and squirm > while trying to reassemble your fractured knowledge, logic and > opinions.
> You are nothing more than theatrical material.
> Enjoy.
> DCI-
Yeh, you can't beat the Goo for fucking up logic.
"When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the existence we know" - Goo
"I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"" - Goo
"Set your clock back by an hour" - Goo
"I didn't say to set your clock back an hour" - Goo
> "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote > On Nov 12, 10:08 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
> > <dh@.> wrote>>Keep telling yourself that, over and and over and over and > > over......
> > > LOL! I keep
> > Telling yourself over and over and over... The human ego defends itself > > any > > way it can.
> > Now that he's not here to make a daily laughing stock of you, you can > > practice this creative rewriting of history.
> What re-writing?
> The quotes are presented exactly as the Goober made them. > --------------->
> Where to begin... The quotes are out of context. The fuckwit got > consistently and severely manhandled by Ball, at every turn and in every > possible way. You were nothing more than an irrelevant sidelight. THAT is > the reality, YOU should forget it and move on, because pretending anything > else and throwing your lot in with usenet's biggest animal abuser and > creep > is just plain stupid.
Once again for those who are mentally diminished, Dave and I will likely NEVER see eye-to-eye on animal welfare or rights but we do agree on one thing for sure:
Goobernicus (Jonny Ball) is the master of OUTSTUPIDIFCATION of himself............and it appears you'd like him to be your mentor. ----------------->
I have nothing to do with him, I just hate to see people delude themselves as you two are doing.
|
