Message from discussion
All About Agile: RUP Model
Received: by 10.114.254.1 with SMTP id b1mr572052wai.4.1223206638639;
Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <phlip2...@gmail.com>
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k19si5050947waf.2.2008.10.05.04.37.17;
Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of phlip2...@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.200.172;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of phlip2...@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=phlip2...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so2307638wfa.16
for <allaboutagile@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=NvY/o2lo2mdRunYUx/0iewFPIpQNLP4B8mjMQJoss3A=;
b=omV1vRz3QKFRG5+3i2ag8svXhsQbOb2A6jJdNCFESx9LjwXsfR0bqf5CQK5Z0uLQHk
IDQUmDbwQm7pq4On2AxfjlQC5TwyqV/eIYtalEP/wTGIBAshMGjjociZpc5zqblmpPEX
XPtKEi7iqe+v9Kood8OoAis+mu2rUMKe3SLDA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=KaBcvAz2URIhF79US6GXu9GCeESGxWZxOS5yRnkpCs5VdjLILU7OoHsfFdjpgYKwyq
4CH3ldRz1WndDfWJPycilE2DHK+VKstzKs0C6og9kTEt+ONieRjIHUYyqoRilTeqvoA4
vkhOy0Nh30K1u9jW3LER5Do+X6jn1394inFmw=
Received: by 10.143.17.13 with SMTP id u13mr1328143wfi.18.1223206637591;
Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <phlip2...@gmail.com>
Received: from ?192.168.1.120? (adsl-76-212-171-145.dsl.sndg02.sbcglobal.net [76.212.171.145])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm9628791wfi.14.2008.10.05.04.37.16
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48E8A6EC.90...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:37:16 -0700
From: Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: allaboutagile@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: All About Agile: RUP Model
References: <349d06e5-6531-4028-bf99-3dd5d4378...@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <349d06e5-6531-4028-bf99-3dd5d4378...@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Prasad.L.V wrote:
> any one have idea on RUP Cycle in SDLC (Rational Unified Process)
Agile processes (such as XP) are more productive than RUP.
Some incarnations of RUP are as productive - when they are also XP. Developers
use test-first, testers pair-program with developers, etc.
--
Phlip
|
