Message from discussion
All About Agile: Re: RUP Model
Received: by 10.100.140.15 with SMTP id n15mr4511900and.0.1223414464075;
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <sandyr...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-gx0-f18.google.com (mail-gx0-f18.google.com [209.85.217.18])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 39si13642273yxd.2.2008.10.07.14.21.03;
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sandyr...@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.18;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sandyr...@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sandyr...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-gx0-f18.google.com with SMTP id 11so7089682gxk.4
for <allaboutagile@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=W/NSgS6FoEw6cY/XDiOi/WtKhXhaKaqRQ2MHW9jqEUI=;
b=TLvq01GUiCaSR1H1stWJNUmvVW6DEzOWeL+FLP1SpoDrUgBFYQSlbeCteDVvvl9o8E
90A4OmgT7X6v2aip9YCZQKRM1OEWtMGMAW+WHOcoA4EZZuxBRB8TFkFEcHoAzT5ezevX
dGqs/RhtgJVnwQ+rwLhgZ6J5kBNt4GvUfPGgI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:references;
b=PRlWPWiCtZRV1JKjtnjksDqhL41TuiIyxhV/vgdg+AkHkCSnpYJ/WkSXgS1QykoGzT
KYPr+TnB0Tj8oM4xD1Ec/x7hhMFU4PVrZ96UA9uklfBD2hn6IFpF+TcJ2AuZ7l+i9UD4
V4t6QNp4XsqxVRV5m49CmJoG3XE0rU10lP69E=
Received: by 10.151.45.2 with SMTP id x2mr816203ybj.82.1223414462292;
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.216.15 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7b8bb06f0810071421i1a546210nef1b3a0bbefa3431@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:21:02 -0700
From: "Sandeep S" <sandyr...@gmail.com>
To: allaboutagile@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: All About Agile: Re: RUP Model
In-Reply-To: <00a801c9287e$b706b430$25141c90$@net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_64334_21350627.1223414462260"
References: <349d06e5-6531-4028-bf99-3dd5d4378...@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
<48E8A6EC.90...@gmail.com> <00a801c9287e$b706b430$25141c90$@net>
------=_Part_64334_21350627.1223414462260
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Prasad,
Another link that you would want to check :
http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/agileUsability.htm
Also by Scott Ambler
Sandeep Seerapu
sandeep.seer...@jbai.com
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Andy <andynaess...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Prasad,
>
> Try this link: http://www.ambysoft.com/unifiedprocess/agileUP.html
>
> Scott Ambler is the Agile Practice Lead at IBM, who bought Rational a few
> years ago.
>
> Andy Naessens
> andynaess...@comcast.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: allaboutagile@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> allaboutagile@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Phlip
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 7:37 AM
> To: allaboutagile@googlegroups.com
> Subject: All About Agile: Re: RUP Model
>
>
> Prasad.L.V wrote:
>
> > any one have idea on RUP Cycle in SDLC (Rational Unified Process)
>
> Agile processes (such as XP) are more productive than RUP.
>
> Some incarnations of RUP are as productive - when they are also XP.
> Developers
> use test-first, testers pair-program with developers, etc.
>
> --
> Phlip
>
>
>
> >
>
------=_Part_64334_21350627.1223414462260
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
<div dir="ltr"><div>Prasad, </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Another link that you would want to check : <a href="http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/agileUsability.htm">http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/agileUsability.htm</a> </div>
<div>Also by Scott Ambler</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Sandeep Seerapu</div>
<div><a href="mailto:sandeep.seer...@jbai.com">sandeep.seer...@jbai.com</a> <br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Andy <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andynaess...@comcast.net">andynaess...@comcast.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br>Prasad,<br><br>Try this link: <a href="http://www.ambysoft.com/unifiedprocess/agileUP.html" target="_blank">http://www.ambysoft.com/unifiedprocess/agileUP.html</a><br>
<br>Scott Ambler is the Agile Practice Lead at IBM, who bought Rational a few<br>years ago.<br><br>Andy Naessens<br><a href="mailto:andynaess...@comcast.net">andynaess...@comcast.net</a><br> <br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:allaboutagile@googlegroups.com">allaboutagile@googlegroups.com</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:allaboutagile@googlegroups.com">allaboutagile@googlegroups.com</a>]<br>On Behalf Of Phlip<br>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 7:37 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:allaboutagile@googlegroups.com">allaboutagile@googlegroups.com</a><br>Subject: All About Agile: Re: RUP Model<br><br><br>Prasad.L.V wrote:<br><br>> any one have idea on RUP Cycle in SDLC (Rational Unified Process)<br>
<br>Agile processes (such as XP) are more productive than RUP.<br><br>Some incarnations of RUP are as productive - when they are also XP.<br>Developers<br>use test-first, testers pair-program with developers, etc.<br><br>
--<br> Phlip<br><br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br></div>
------=_Part_64334_21350627.1223414462260--
|
