|
|
Added Bytes Cheat Sheets |
Don't know if it's already too late, but I suppose feedback is always
All in all very well done, thanks for your great work, that's one more
Greets, Charly
On 2 Aug., 22:50, Dave Child <d...@addedbytes.com> wrote:
> Saw getbackboard.com the other day - looks like it might be a good
> Dave
> On 1 Aug, 18:33, Levi Watts <viruswa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On three systems that I have worked on, each had methods of giving
> > A comment system that appears on the same page as the subject being
> > In this case, that would be a page dedicated to stating what the sheet
> > I have knowledge in C#, VB, .net, and a few others. I have no
> > On 1 Aug, 08:31, "David Child" <d...@addedbytes.com> wrote:
> > > The Python cheat sheet will, unless there's anything else to be
> > > Latest version is still:http://added-bytes-cheat-sheets.googlegroups.com/web/python_cheat_she...
> > > The one change that is going to be completed this weekend is that the
> > > Unfortunately, no feedback on the preview yet, which either means:
> > > 1) I got it right first time. Woohoo :)
> > > At the risk of this going unread or unanswered, anyone have any ideas
> > > Dave
> > > --
appreciated.
At first, good idea to remove the regexp section, because it's almost
always the same. I hope you replace it with a list of list methods?!
And to the list of special class methods, if you mention some of the
mathematical operators like __eq__() you should maybe also mention
that there are a lot more if these (e.g. for shift and modulo etc).
The sys.argv box and the slicing is done very well, but I miss
something about string formatting.
Other things coming into my mind were some unicode decode functions
(because I'm German and I often have problems with umlauts) and time
functions, because without them, the strftime reference is more or
less useless.
cheat sheet in my collection.
> Thanks for your feedback, Levi. From the sound of it, I get the
> impression that there might be better options out there.
> alternative. Would be perfect if it allowed you to give a public URL
> to a board, but sadly you have to invite everyone individually,
> apparently - which seems a bit odd to me.
> > feedback. I have yet to receive feedback on any of those. The first
> > had a user base in the few hundred, but the users didn't have reason
> > to use it often. The second and third had active users, but never
> > over twenty.
> > talked about seem to have the best feedback potential. Those that
> > have a comment box right after the user has seen the subject.
> > is, an image of it w/ a download link for it, a comment box to follow,
> > and finally the feedback already received (mix and match as you
> > please).
> > knowledge in Subversion or Python.
> > > changed, be released next week, so if you have anything to add or
> > > suggest, now's the time!
> > > regex section will be replaced (given that regex has its own cheat
> > > sheet).
> > > 2) No Python developers in the group.
> > > 3) My email saying that the preview was up didn't make it to anyone.
> > > 4) Google Groups is the wrong format for this sort of feedback system.
> > > if there is a better way to get other people involved and solicit
> > > feedback on cheat sheets before they're released?
> > > AddedBytes.com - Web Marketing and Development