Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Potential Indexing Problems from Comprehensive Change in Page URLs
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Damien Anderson  
View profile
 More options 12 May, 15:10
From: Damien Anderson <dam...@blowfishdigital.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 15:10:26 +0100
Local: Mon 12 May 2008 15:10
Subject: Re: [SEM2] Re: Potential Indexing Problems from Comprehensive Change in Page URLs

Hiya,

This might help you out on Windows
http://www.port80software.com/products/customerror/ $99.95 Server License

I have used it on a few projects and all have worked like a charm.

Damien

From: roscoe <roscoetra...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: <SEM2@googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 07:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: "SEM 2.0" <SEM2@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [SEM2] Re: Potential Indexing Problems from Comprehensive Change in
Page  URLs

Brian, Dan, Chris, Alec and any future responders.

Thanks a bunch for your insights and help with our major website
overhaul. The devil is truly in the details, eh?

The development firm is building the site on a windows platform so we
won't be able to employ the standard 301 redirects via the .htaccess
file but I know from looking into this previously there is an
equivalent windows script protocol. My job will be on the testing end
to check their work to make sure the redirects perform as I expect.

Also appreciated the reminder on the 404 page. We need to have a
customized one and have Google Analytics code installed on the page so
we can track entrances to the page.

-Roscoe

On May 10, 6:54 am, foliovision <clientc...@emailias.com> wrote:

> Hello Dan,

> Actually our .htaccess redirects are more or less a script, as they
> are carefully crafted on regular expressions. You are right - if you
> get something wrong, it is all extremely messy. But a script can also
> go wrong. Careful spidering tests are essential in both cases.

> That's a good idea to add link recovery into the workflow.

> Running a tight website is a very long list of things to check and
> correct. It would be great to have an automatic tool which checked and
> fixed all of this. Sometimes it looks like webwork will have to the
> way of farming - larger plantations.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google